United States v. Roderick Ian Nichols, United States of America v. Roderick Ian Nichols, United States of America v. Ronald Gregory McCaffery United States of America v. Steven Darrell Udell, United States of America v. Kenneth Alan Clagett, United States of America v. Owen Willis Turman, United States of America v. Kurtis Lee Bristow

956 F.2d 276 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderick Ian NICHOLS, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderick Ian NICHOLS, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Gregory MCCAFFERY, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Darrell UDELL, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Alan CLAGETT, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Owen Willis TURMAN, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kurtis Lee BRISTOW, Defendant-Appellant Nos. 90-50209, 90-50285, 90-50286, 90-50319, 90-50349, 90-50322 and 90-50323. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 8, 1992. * Decided Feb. 14, 1992. Before FARRIS, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER ** 2 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.…