Darryl Johnson v. Reynolds Metals Co. William L. Dehart Graphic Communications Union 2

956 F.2d 1167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darryl JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS METALS CO.; William L. Dehart; Graphic Communications Union # 2, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-55099. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 26, 1992. * Decided March 3, 1992. Before CANBY, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darryl Johnson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against his former employer and union as barred by the statute of limitations. We review de novo, Donoghue v. Orange County, 848 F.2d 926, 929 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 Johnson contends that his action was timely because he did not receive final notice of the union's decision to withdraw his grievance until August 2, 1989, the date on which he filed his complaint. This contention lacks merit. 4 The six-month statute of limitations provided by section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act applies to…