United States v. Exeter Orange Company, Inc., Sequoia Orange Co., Inc., Sequoia Enterprises Carl A. Pescosolido, Jr. Marvin L. Wilson Oleah H. Wilson

958 F.2d 378 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXETER ORANGE COMPANY, INC., Sequoia Orange Co., Inc., Sequoia Enterprises; Carl A. Pescosolido, Jr.; Marvin L. Wilson; Oleah H. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants. No. 90-16300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1991. Submission (Deferred Oct. 10, 1991. Resubmitted March 18, 1992. Decided March 27, 1992. Before GOODWIN, WILLIAM B. NORRIS and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 A decade of refusal to comply with federal marketing orders governing navel oranges, Valencia oranges, and lemons, see 7 C.F.R. Parts 907, 908, and 910, as authorized in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1937, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., ("AMAA") led to this permanent injunction. We affirm. 3 The United States filed the initial action in this case almost a decade ago on June 11, 1982 seeking a preliminary injunction to require…