Gerald E. Rogers, and Raymond Mason Holling v. Harol L. Whitley Frankie Sue Del Papa Richard Bryan Jessie Walsh George Sumner, Gerald E. Rogers, and William McKinney v. Harol L. Whitley Frankie Sue Del Papa Richard Bryan Jessie Walsh George Sumner

Good Law
958 F.2d 378·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11189
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199290-16461California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

958 F.2d 378 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerald E. ROGERS, Plaintiff, and Raymond Mason Holling, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harol L. WHITLEY; Frankie Sue Del Papa; Richard Bryan; Jessie Walsh; George Sumner, Defendants-Appellees. Gerald E. ROGERS, Plaintiff, and William McKinney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harol L. WHITLEY; Frankie Sue Del Papa; Richard Bryan; Jessie Walsh; George Sumner, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 90-16461, 90-16462. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1992. * Decided March 16, 1992. Before CHOY, FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 After the heating system in the Nevada State Prison broke down for four weeks in the winter of 1988-89, Raymond Mason Holling and William McKinney brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging that they were subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court entered summary judgment, and we affirm. 3 It was a record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.