United States v. Lyle John Hitchcock, United States of America v. Tito Le Franc, United States of America v. Greg Hewitt, United States of America v. Michael Christakis

Good Law
958 F.2d 379·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199291-50114California686 words

Opinion

Opinion

958 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lyle John HITCHCOCK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tito LE FRANC, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Greg HEWITT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CHRISTAKIS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50114, 91-50119, 91-50162 and 91-50291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1992. Decided March 16, 1992. Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Michael Christakis, Tito Le Franc, Greg Hewitt, and Lyle Hitchcock all entered conditional guilty pleas to an indictment alleging conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). All assert that the district court erroneously failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.