Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Mastro
Opinion
Opinion
959 F.2d 239 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CORPORATION OF the PRESIDING BISHOP OF the CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael R. MASTRO, and "Jane Doe" Mastro, and the marital community composed thereof, d/b/a G & M Investments; Professional Escrow Services, Inc., a Washington corporation; Erwin Wood, and "Jane Doe" Wood, and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-35410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1992. Decided March 30, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 * In the course of denying both cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court reasoned that 3 [e]ven assuming that Mastro notified the [Corporation of the Presiding Bishop (CPB) ] within this review period, the letter and FAX sent to [CPB] do not constitute a termination of…