Ali T. Agha v. Department of the Army United States Department of Justice Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

959 F.2d 239 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY; United States Department of Justice; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15663. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 25, 1992. * Decided March 30, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, TANG and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ali T. Agha appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint based on the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522a(g)(1). The district court concluded that Agha had failed to serve the defendants personally, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). Agha contends that dismissal of his complaint for failure to comply with the technical requirements of Rule 4(d) was improper. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1 3 "When a party has failed to comply with the requirements of service within the requisite time period, we review the district court's…