Artas Film & Tv Productions Gmbh v. W. Roger Shepherd, and Harvey Goldsmith Harvey Goldsmith Entertainments Ltd.

959 F.2d 239 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ARTAS FILM & TV PRODUCTIONS GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Roger SHEPHERD, et al., Defendant, and Harvey Goldsmith; Harvey Goldsmith Entertainments Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-55008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1992. Decided April 9, 1992. Before BOOCHEVER, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Artas Film and Television Productions ("Artas") appeals the district court's dismissal of defendants Harvey Goldsmith and Harvey Goldsmith Entertainments, Ltd. from this suit for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. 3 * This case arises from the aborted production of a benefit concert that was to take place in Moscow for the victims of the Armenian earthquake. Artas, a German company, obtained the rights to produce this concert from Gosconcert, the official Soviet concert production agency. Artas then entered into an agreement with…