Nancy Langlois v. Harrah's Tahoe, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Holiday Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

959 F.2d 240 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nancy LANGLOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRAH'S TAHOE, INC., a Nevada Corporation; Holiday Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1992. Decided April 1, 1992. Before CHAMBERS, FARRIS and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Nancy Langlois, a former cocktail waitress employed by Harrah's Tahoe, Inc. ("Harrah's"), filed a complaint alleging various state causes of action and sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII. Following a motion for partial summary judgment, the district court dismissed two of the three pendent state claims on the merits, and refused to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction over the third claim. The district court entered judgment for Harrah's following a bench trial on the Title VII claim. We have jurisdiction over Langlois's appeal…