The Good Ship Violet James O'leary, Sr. v. Lighthouse Marina and Riverbend Development
Opinion
Opinion
959 F.2d 240 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. THE GOOD SHIP VIOLET, et al.; James O'Leary, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIGHTHOUSE MARINA AND RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1992. * Decided April 10, 1992. Before HUG, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James O'Leary, Sr. appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his civil rights claim based on 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3). We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 O'Leary's complaint alleged that the defendant violated his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3). The complaint also contained a reference to 28 U.S.C. § 1333 , which establishes jurisdiction in the district court in actions involving admiralty law. Upon defendant's motion for summary judgment, the district court found that O'Leary failed to establish the existence of a conspiracy and that defendant's…