In Re Steve Strowski Margaret H. Strowski, Debtors. Steve Strowski v. Master Cutting and Engineering Company

959 F.2d 241 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Steve STROWSKI; Margaret H. Strowski, Debtors. Steve STROWSKI, Appellant, v. MASTER CUTTING AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, Appellee. No. 87-6566. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 25, 1992. * Decided April 1, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, TANG and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steve Strowski appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") denial of his motion to reconsider its decision affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of his adversary proceeding in his Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. 1 The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court's conclusion that the adversary proceeding was barred by res judicata based on a previous state court judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and affirm. 3 We review de novo the legal conclusions of the bankruptcy court and the BAP. Cimarron Investors v. WYID Properties (In re Cimarron Investors), 848…