Thriftway Company v. Amorient Petroleum Incorporated, and Pacific Resources, Inc. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.

Good Law
959 F.2d 241·1992 WL 69328·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21872
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 199291-55188California1,953 words

Opinion

Opinion

959 F.2d 241 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. THRIFTWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMORIENT PETROLEUM INCORPORATED, Defendant, and Pacific Resources, Inc.; Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-55188. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1992. Decided April 8, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, O'SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Thriftway Company ("Thriftway") was granted a declaratory judgment the effect of which was that Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc. ("HIRI") contribute towards the cost of a Department of Energy ("DOE") order which required Thriftway to refund improperly paid crude oil refining entitlement benefits. 3 * HIRI alleges that the Hawaiian statute of limitations, or the limitation period in paragraph 4.4(d) of the processing agreement ("agreement") barred Thriftway from bringing this action. The district court found that paragraph 4.4(d) was ambiguous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.