United States v. Javier Aaron Dabdoub-Canez, United States of America v. Francisco Pable Cortez-Espinoza, United States of America v. Guillermo Soto-Esquer

959 F.2d 242 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Aaron DABDOUB-CANEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Pable CORTEZ-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo SOTO-ESQUER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10219, 91-10231 and 91-10309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1992. Decided April 9, 1992. Before REINHARDT, NOONAN and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In an opinion filed this date, we held that the district court properly sentenced appellant Javier Aaron Dabdoub-Canez to ten years in prison for his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 846 . In this memorandum disposition we reject the appellants' remaining arguments. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE 3 In determining whether evidence is sufficient to…