United States v. Joan Anna Yuk Lin Van Schoiack Frederick Neal Stribling Cecil Cleve Van Schoiack Larry Cecil Van Schoiack Allene Van Schoiack Appellants-Appellants

959 F.2d 243 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joan Anna Yuk Lin VAN SCHOIACK; Frederick Neal Stribling; Cecil Cleve Van Schoiack; Larry Cecil Van Schoiack; Allene Van Schoiack; Appellants-Appellants. Nos. 90-3050, 1 90-30357, 90-30377, 90-30383 and 90-30392. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1992. Decided April 1, 1992. 1 Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and FONG, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 From December 1985 until mid-1989, the appellants participated in a scheme to defraud homeowners of their properties by effecting a transfer of ownership to their own companies and agreeing to assume responsibility for all past due and future mortgage payments. After obtaining the properties, the appellants failed to make the necessary payments, resulting in the foreclosure of the properties. Substantial losses were suffered by the original owners and…