Appellants present to this court a motion to delete and add to the clerk’s transcript on appeal, with respect to a number of items. Ninety-one items are requested deleted, and three items added. The items requested deleted appear in respondent’s designation of additional documents to be included in the clerk’s transcript. (Rules on Appeal, rule 5(b).)

In support of the motion appellants’ counsel has filed an affidavit, deposing, in part, as follows :

The Rules on Appeal present an orderly and scientific method of preparing the clerk’s transcript.

Within 10 days after filing notice of appeal, the appellant shall serve on the respondent and file with the clerk a notice designating what appellant requires included in the transcript. (Rule 5(a).)

Within 10 days after service of appellant’s notice, the respondent may serve and file a notice designating additional papers or records. And respondent shall pay the clerk the cost thereof. (Rule 5(b).)

The record on appeal in this case is at this point. Neither clerk’s nor reporter’s transcript has been prepared.

Rule 5(d) requires the clerk to prepare the transcript, when the cost thereof has been arranged for.

Rule 8 requires the clerk to mail notice of the completion of the transcripts. Within 10 days thereafter either party may file request for correction of such transcripts.

If no such request is filed, it will be presumed that the trial court used the entire record shown in the clerk’s transcript at the time of its decision. (Redsted v. Weiss, 71 Cal.App.2d 660 [ 163 P.2d 105 ].)

If request for correction is made, the matter is set for hearing and determination by the judge who tried the case. (Rule 8(b).)

Therefore, in this ease, the forum of petitioner is the superior court, upon a proper request for the correction of the clerk’s transcript when it is made. If unnecessary, redundant, or improper matter is included in the clerk’s transcript, the superior court has the power to delete it. (Redsted v. Weiss, supra.)

And the trial court shall determine what papers were “used” upon the hearing. (Thomas v. Thomas, 66 Cal.App. 2d 818 [ 153 P.2d 389 ].)

The motion is denied.

White, P. J., concurred.

Doran, J., concurred in the judgment.