Kejr

Kejr v. Natural Resources, Inc.

Good Law
166 Cal. App. 2d 571·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1439·333 P.2d 93
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1958Civ. No. 9366California1,719 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dyke, J.

—Plaintiff-respondent brought this action against defendant-appellant Mendocino Logging Company and defendant-appellant Construction Engineers, In *573 corporated, to quiet title to 40 acres of timber land in Mendocino County. The appeal is from a judgment decreeing that plaintiff is the owner of the property and quieting his title thereto. The complaint is in the usual brief form of an action to quiet title. Appellants’ answers denied the allegations of plaintiff’s ownership and affirmatively pleaded that they owned the timber on the land.

On September 27, 1948, six people, four of whom bore the name “Hopkins” and two of whom bore the name “Raderchak,” and all of whom were related, were the owners of the subject property. We shall refer to this group as “Hopkins.” On that day, and simultaneously, they executed two documents with 0. 0. Barker. One was a quitclaim deed and the other was a document called a holding agreement. The deed contained a statement that the interest thereby conveyed was subject to the holding agreement. The deed was recorded. The holding agreement was not. The trial court found on sufficient evidence that appellant Construction Engineers, Inc., had both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.