Williams v. Denver

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 2d 101·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 2301·334 P.2d 161
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 1959Civ. No. 5907California1,021 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shepard, J.

In May, 1955, Henry and Mildred M. Williams (hereinafter called plaintiffs) made a contract partly in writing and partly oral with John G. and Maryesther Denver (hereinafter called defendants) by which defendants were to purchase and operate a bail bond business, which we will hereinafter call the “Webb” business. The purchase was *102 made with money advanced by plaintiffs. Ostensibly, the business was to be owned by defendants but actually defendants were to act as the agents of plaintiffs, both in the purchase and operation. Plaintiffs were already operating another bail bond business in their own name, so that with the new purchase they became the owners of two bail bond businesses. The one which they operated under their own name we will hereinafter refer to as the “Williams” business.

Defendants agreed to deposit all receipts of the Webb business with Elliott and Murray, as trustees, and all business expenses and disbursements were to be made from such trust account. Defendants were to receive as compensation $100 per week plus all expenses, plus 10 per cent of all premium charges received in both the Webb and the Williams businesses. One half of this percentage was to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.