Difloe

Difloe v. Difloe

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 2d 47·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 2419·335 P.2d 177
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1959Civ. No. 17933California2,135 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Peters, J.

The trial court granted Frank Difloe a divorce from Helen Difloe, finding that the wife was guilty of extreme cruelty in that “since on or about Christmas 1953 defendant [wife] has failed and refused to permit plaintiff to see or visit the minor child of the parties, . . . and has concealed the child’s whereabouts from the plaintiff, without any justification on defendant’s part or provocation on plaintiff’s part.” Helen Difloe appeals.

The plaintiff is a chief gunner’s mate in the United States Navy, on active duty. During the times here involved he was in San Francisco on relatively rare intervals, and but for short periods of time. The parties were married on March 3, 1945, and separated on January 11, 1952. There is one child of the marriage. In December of 1955, the husband filed the present action for divorce, alleging extreme cruelty. In 1953 the husband brought a prior action for divorce, which was denied by the trial court. In that action, without a cross-complaint by the wife, or without any claim for affirmative relief by her, the trial court granted the wife custody of the child, with reasonable visitation rights in the husband, and awarded the wife $200 per month…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.