Horn

Horn v. Govan

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 2d 77·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1926·341 P.2d 784
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 1959Civ. No. 9589California1,636 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schottky, J.

Plaintiffs Bertram M. Horn and Lawrence J. Horn filed an action against defendants Orville Govan and Ellen Govan to quiet title to certain real property in Lake County and for damages for the holding of said real property by defendants. Defendants filed an answer admitting that defendant Orville Govan was in possession of said real property and alleging that he had an interest therein and denying that defendant Ellen Govan claimed any interest in said real property. Defendants also alleged that plaintiffs’ action was barred by section 318 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The ease was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and the court found that plaintiffs were the owners of said real property and entitled to the possession thereof; that defendants had no interest therein; and that plaintiffs’ cause of action was not barred by section 318 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment was entered in accordance with said findings and defendants have appealed from said judgment.

Appellants made a number of contentions, but before discussing them we shall summarize briefly the evidence as shown by the record. Appellant Orville Govan and his brother Roy, who is respondents’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.