Marroquin

Marroquin v. Barrial

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 2d 540·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1733·345 P.2d 30
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 1959Civ. No. 23504California1,760 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Woodparker, J.

This is an action to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of a promissory note and a trust deed; or, in the alternative (if the conveyance cannot be set aside), for damages. Plaintiff appeals from judgment in favor of defendants.

Defendants Antonio and Eva Barrial, husband and wife, were owners of a promissory note and a third trust deed, which deed was given as security for payment of the note. On April 18, 1956, in another action wherein the present plaintiff was plaintiff and defendant Antonio Barrial was the defendant, it was stipulated that judgment should be for plaintiff for $3,558.55. Pursuant to the stipulation judgment was entered on May 2,1956.

In the present case, the complaint alleged that on April 18, 1956, the defendants Antonio Barrial and Eva Barrial, for the purpose of defrauding the plaintiff Marroquin, transferred to defendant Baiden a certain note and trust deed which were owned by defendants Barrial ■ the note was in the amount of $8,000 and was so transferred for an inadequate consideration, and as a result the defendant Antonio Barrial was rendered insolvent and unable to satisfy the said stipulated judgment; that said conveyance was executed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.