Howser

Howser v. Caruso

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 2d 551·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1735·344 P.2d 854
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 1959Civ. No. 23696California672 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shinn, J.

The first cause of action of the complaint is for attorney’s fees of the alleged value of $2,540; the second cause of action is based upon an account stated in the same amount. Defendant filed an answer denying that there remained unpaid the sum of $2,540 and denying that he was indebted to plaintiff in any amount. He also filed a cross-complaint alleging that he paid plaintiff $5,000 as a retainer which was to be credited against plaintiff’s fees of $150 for each day spent in court in the service of defendant. It was also alleged that defendant had paid to plaintiff a total of *552 more than $7,550 to cover fees earned under the alleged per diem charge. The answer to the cross-complaint admitted the receipt of $7,550 but denied the other allegations.

The court found that plaintiff rendered services of the reasonable value of $2,540, no part of which had been paid; defendant paid plaintiff $5,000 but there was no agreement that the sum should be credited against per diem fees of $150 for days spent in court. It was found further that an account was stated between plaintiff and defendant; $2,540 was found to be due and unpaid to plaintiff; defendant agreed to pay that sum and has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.