Lavine

Lavine v. Davis

Good Law
175 Cal. App. 2d 647·1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1390·346 P.2d 426
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1959Civ. No. 23807California1,114 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Herndon, J.

Plaintiff Morris Lavine appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Muriel Davis in an action in which plaintiff sought to recover attorney fees. Another named defendant, Gary Davis, although served with summons, failed to appear or answer. It does not appear that any judgment has been entered with respect to him and he is not a party to this appeal.

*648 Plaintiff’s complaint is in three counts: (1) on an express oral contract alleging that defendants hired plaintiff “as an attorney at law to render to them and for and on their behalf legal services, for which they, the said defendants, then and there agreed to pay to plaintiff the reasonable value thereof; . . . [t]hat pursuant to said contract plaintiff rendered to, for and on behalf of defendants legal services and that the balance due for the reasonable value thereof was and is the sum of [$25,000] . . and that after demand defendants had failed and refused to pay,- (2) on an alleged open book account; and (3) on an account stated for $25,000 for legal services. Each count alleged that said legal services constituted “necessities.”

The trial court found that as to the defendant Muriel Davis all the material allegations of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.