Trujillo

People v. Trujillo

Good Law
183 Cal. App. 2d 388·1960 Cal. App. LEXIS 1763·6 Cal. Rptr. 535
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1960Crim. No. 7239California581 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Robert Moses Trujillo was charged by information with possessing heroin. It was also alleged that he had previously suffered two felony convictions for burglary. In a court trial Trujillo was found guilty of possession; no finding was made as to the priors. Trujillo appeals from the judgment.

*389 Appellant was represented by counsel at the trial. He applied for appointment of counsel on the appeal. After reading the record we denied the application for the reason that the appeal has no semblance of merit and the appointment of an attorney would serve no useful purpose. Appellant was notified of the denial and his time to file a brief was extended; none has been filed.

There was evidence of the following facts. Officer Norris and two other officers drove to a rooming house on South Flower in Los Angeles and went upstairs. As Norris walked down the hall he looked through an open doorway into one of the rooms. Trujillo was standing in front of a dresser with his back to the officers. A man was standing at his left and a woman at his right. When they heard the officers appellant’s companions stepped away from him and Trujillo reached forward with his right hand, dropping a spike…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.