Ransdell

Ransdell v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

Good Law
185 Cal. App. 2d 335·1960 Cal. App. LEXIS 1511·8 Cal. Rptr. 302
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 1960Civ. No. 24545California3,316 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wood, J.

This is an action for damages resulting from a collision of an interurban electric car and an automobile in an intersection of streets in Long Beach. The automobile was owned and operated by plaintiff Viola Ransdell; and plaintiff Mary Hall was a passenger therein. The electric car, which was a passenger car of defendant Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority, was operated by defendant Carl Rummans. Mrs. Ransdell and Mrs. Hall sought damages for personal injuries, and Mrs. Ransdell also sought damages for destruction of her automobile. Judgment, in accordance with verdicts, was for Mrs. Ransdell for $5,000, and was for Mrs. Hall for $25,000. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied, and they appeal from the judgment.

Appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment; the court erred in instructing the jury on the doctrine of last clear chance; and the damages awarded to Mrs. Hall were excessive.

The collision occurred in the intersection of American Avenue and 16th Street. American Avenue, which is 85 feet wide, extends northerly and southerly, and 16th Street, which is 36 feet wide, extends easterly and westerly. There is a double white line…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.