Farina

Farina v. Town of Emeryville

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 288·188 Cal. App. 2d 100·1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2396
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 1961Civ. No. 19400California1,470 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Draper, J.

This appeal concerns the amount of retirement pension to which plaintiff is entitled. He joined the police department of defendant city in 1935, and was continuously employed therein until his retirement April 1, 1956. At that time he was over 60 years of age, and had been chief of *102 police for about 10 years. He received a pension of $211.41 per month for three years after his retirement. He then brought this action, asserting that he was entitled to receive half the salary of the active police chief, whose pay from the date of plaintiff’s retirement had risen from $670 to $880 per month. He was awarded money judgment for the excess of this 50 per cent allowance over what had actually been paid to him for three years, and also a declaration that henceforth his retirement allowance should be half of current salary of the police chief. Defendant appeals.

In 1929, Emeryville adopted Ordinance 224, setting up a pension system for police department employees, and incorporating by reference the provisions of the Police etc. Pension Fund Act (Stats. 1889, ch. 62, p. 56). At an election held October 23,1944, the voters of the city adopted Ordinance Number 331, authorizing a contract…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.