Moore

Moore v. Moore

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 659·190 Cal. App. 2d 129·1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2275
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 1961Civ. No. 10028California1,497 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Warns, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on April 21, 1960, decreeing that the partnership existing between the plaintiffs and the defendant under the firm name of Moore Truck Lines, was dissolved as of December 19, 1956, and ordering plaintiffs to pay to defendant the sum of $12,918.21, which sum represented defendant’s interest in the partnership on the date of dissolution.

Appellant first contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and conclusion of the trial court that the partnership was dissolved on or about December 19, 1956. As stated by this court in Pores v. Purity Milk Co., 135 Cal.App.2d 305, 307 [ 287 P.2d 169 ] : . if the factual *131 determination made by the trier of fact is supported by competent and legally sufficient evidence, an appellate court is bound by that determination even though there is an abundance of record evidence to the contrary.” And at page 309, “It is not the province of a reviewing court to comment on each evidentiary conflict or disagreement or to present a detailed argument on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings. [Citing cases.] ”

We do not deem it necessary or useful to make a detailed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.