Rubino

Rubino v. Board of Trustees

Good Law
12 Cal. Rptr. 690·191 Cal. App. 2d 366·1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2061
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 1961Civ. No. 10069California732 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schottky, J.

Frank Rubino and Norman A. Gulliekson, copartners doing business under the firm name and style *367 of Rubino and. Gulliekson, have appealed from a judgment denying them recovery in the amount of $973.40 in an action brought against the Curtis Creek School District to recover for alleged extra work under a contract. The appeal is on the judgment roll.

In July 1957, Rubino and Gulliekson entered into a written contract with the Board of Trustees of the Curtis Creek School District in Tuolumne County for the construction of a school plant and a playground for the sum of $354,170. The original plans called for the playground to be perfectly flat, but the plans were changed to provide for the playground to be sloped. The change order also called for a change in the design in the drainage system. The plans for the project required that the contractor construct a 24-inch ditch around the perimeter of the playground area. The contractors, in accordance with the requirements of the plans, constructed a “V’’-shaped ditch along the west side of the playground for drainage purposes. Beyond the west side of the playground a pump was installed and in order to facilitate crossing the ditch one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.