Robert Chuman v. Craig A. Wright, and Mark P. Fronterotta

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 4165·960 F.2d 104·1992 WL 57540·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5374
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 199292-55007California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

This appeal challenges the district court’s denial of the individual defendants’ motion for summary judgment on their claim of qualified immunity in an action for damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The individual defendant-appellants filed a notice of appeal from the denial of qualified immunity pursuant to Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 , 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985), and moved in the dis trict court for a stay of proceedings pending appeal. The district court denied the motion for stay. Appellants then filed a motion for a stay in this court, which was granted pending further order of this court.

In this circuit, where, as here, the interlocutory claim is immediately appeal-able, its filing divests the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with trial. United States v. Claiborne, 727 F.2d 842, 850 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 113 , 83 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). It has been noted, however, that this result could significantly disrupt and delay trial court proceedings. Claiborne, 727 F.2d at 850 .

While this circuit has not addressed this issue in the context of interlocutory qualified immunity appeals, other circuits have.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.