Columbia River Gorge United-Protecting People And Property v. Clayton K. Yeutter

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 4219·960 F.2d 110·22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20947·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5429·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2655
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 199290-35588California2,663 words

Opinion

Opinion

960 F.2d 110 22 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,947 COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE UNITED-PROTECTING PEOPLE AND PROPERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clayton K. YEUTTER, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States; COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION, Defendants-Appellees, FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 90-35588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 10, 1991. Decided March 30, 1992. James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Robert Klarquist, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee Yeutter. Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Michael Reynolds, Asst. Sol. Gen., State of Or., Salem, Or., James Johnson, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lawrence Watters, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Wash., for defendants-appellees Columbia Gorge. Victor M. Sher, Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc., Seattle, Wash., for defendant-intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an action challenging the constitutionality of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.