Brock
Department of Mental Hygiene v. Brock
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Conley, J.
The Department of Mental Hygiene of the State of California appeals from a judgment of dismissal after the sustaining of a demurrer to its first amended complaint. The department sued Roy Brock as the administrator *83 of the estate of Cornelius Irving Brock, deceased, for $5,115.14, alleging that such amount was due from decedent for the cost of the care, support and maintenance of his incompetent wife at Stockton State Hospital, and that the action was commenced within the time limited by section 353 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The ground upon which the demurrer was sustained was that there was no allegation of the presentation of a claim for the amount in question as prescribed by the Probate Code, § 700 et seq., and that the suit was consequently barred.
The trial court’s ruling was erroneous. It is the rule in this state that the sections of the Probate Code requiring the filing of claims do not refer to obligations imposed by law, such as taxes (People v. Hochwender, 20 Cal.2d 181 [ 124 P.2d 823 ]), alimony payments (Millar v. Millar, 51 Cal.App. 718, 728-729 [ 197 P. 811 ]), or tort claims not specifically included in the appropriate code sections (Hardin v. Sin…