Vayne

Vayne v. Department of Employment

Good Law
19 Cal. Rptr. 329·1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 2740·200 Cal. App. 2d 517
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1962Civ. No. 25922California364 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burke, J.

On February 1, 1961, appellant filed a claim with the Department of Employment for unemployment insurance benefits. The department ruled initially that appellant was ineligible for benefits for a period of four weeks on the ground that appellant had voluntarily terminated her most recent employment. The department also found appellant was ineligible for a further period because of an alleged false statement made to it. Upon an appeal to the referee, a hearing was held and the referee affirmed the denial of benefits for the four weeks’ period but reversed the department with respect to the additional ineligibility assessed because of the alleged false statement of fact.

Appellant appealed to the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which affirmed the referee’s decision. Appellant then filed a petition in the superior court for writ of mandate and an alternative writ of mandate was issued. The matter was heard and the court issued a judgment affirming the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. This appeal is from that judgment.

Her employer testified appellant informed him she was quitting her employment “. . . because of the problem she was having with this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.