Holland

Holland v. Challis

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 2620·20 Cal. Rptr. 64·201 Cal. App. 2d 494
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1962Civ. No. 25953California3,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burke, J.

Does the subsequent marriage of the natural parents of an illegitimate child have the effect of depriving the court of jurisdiction to proceed with an adoption previously consented to by the mother, without obtaining the consent of the father? This is the question raised in this proceeding by appellant petitioners who appeal from an order dismissing their petition to adopt Baby Boy Laws.

The mother of Baby Boy Laws lived with intervener from May 1959 to May 20, 1960, although she was still married to Robert L. Laws by whom she had a previous child. This child was also living with her. It was during this period that Baby Boy Laws was conceived. On May 20, 1960, the natural mother and intervener ceased living together. Subsequently, on June 10, 1960, the natural mother obtained a final decree of divorce from husband Laws. Baby Boy Laws was born on August 25, 1960.

Prior to the child’s birth the natural mother learned of petitioners and afterwards placed her child with them for adoption. She allegedly told the child’s father that Baby Boy Laws had died. The child has been with the petitioners since birth, and they filed their petition for adoption on September 15, 1960,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.