Plount

Plount v. Tenzer

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 2501·20 Cal. Rptr. 790·202 Cal. App. 2d 459
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 1962Civ. No. 25860California707 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fourt, J.

This is an appeal by the contestants from a judgment which in effect admitted a lost holographic will to probate and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Darlene E. Jett, known by several different names (hereinafter referred to as the decedent or testatrix), died on January 4, 1960. She had been married and divorced; however she had no children. There were seven brothers and four sisters, the contestants being the seven brothers and three sisters. The proponent of the will is Elodean Tenzer, a daughter of Celeste Goldman, the noncontesting sister of decedent. Under the lost will the entire estate went to a minor son of Elodean Tenzer.

After a trial before the court without a jury a judgment was ordered which admitted the lost holographic will to probate. A motion for a new trial was denied.

There was evidence which, if believed, established that decedent did in her own handwriting in the presence of two persons (Elodean Tenzer and Celeste Goldman) entirely write, date and sign a will on March 23, 1954. 1 Decedent furthermore read the will aloud to each of the persons present and then apparently gave it for safekeeping to Celeste Goldman, one of the persons present.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.