Portola Development Co. v. Board of Trustees

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 2343·203 Cal. App. 2d 129·21 Cal. Rptr. 432
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 1962Civ. No. 19947California1,553 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Salsman, J.

The plaintiff sought declaratory relief under a written contract with the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University (hereinafter referred to as Stanford). The Ladera Recreation District intervened. The trial court determined there was nothing due plaintiff under the contract at time of trial, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The plaintiff is the developer of the Ladera subdivision adjacent to Stanford lands in San Mateo County. In order to serve the subdivision with sewers it was necessary to run an outfall sewer line across Stanford property to connect with the facilities of the Menlo Park Sanitary District. Plaintiff negotiated with Stanford for an easement for the sewer line and with the Menlo Park Sanitary District for the use of its facilities. The negotiations resulted in the written contract of November 25, 1952. Under the contract plaintiff obtained an easement from Stanford; plaintiff agreed to install the sewer line along a route to conform to Stanford’s land development program and to make the line of sufficient size to accommodate not only the needs of the Ladera subdivi *131 sion but also the needs of Stanford as its lands might be developed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.