Hart

Smith v. Hart

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 2369·203 Cal. App. 2d 374·21 Cal. Rptr. 513
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 1962Civ. No. 10260California785 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Peek, J.

Jim Smith, proponent and sole beneficiary of a holographic instrument, appeals from the judgment of *375 nonsuit and from the order appointing James C. Hart the administrator of the estate of Robert C. Lampkin.

Robert Lampkin, who had never been married and had no children, was 60 years of age, retired, and living alone in a small house that he owned. Smith, who also lived alone, was 68 years of age and a dealer in junk. He had been a friend of Lampkin’s since 1932 and had been in the habit of stopping daily to visit with Lampkin. On the 25th of January 1960, Lampkin asked Smith to come into his house. He then gave him the instrument in question. The following day Smith stopped by Lampkin’s home and receiving no response from Lampkin, he returned to his home, obtained the instrument, and went to the sheriff’s office. Two deputies returned with Smith to the Lampkin home and found Lampkin dead.

Smith petitioned for letters of administration and for probate of the holographic instrument he had received from Lampkin. Contestants, two brothers and seven nieces and nephews, filed a petition for letters of administration and requested that their petition be heard on the same date as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.