Murphey

Murphey v. Vellutini

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1476·211 Cal. App. 2d 1·26 Cal. Rptr. 835
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 1962Civ. No. 10504California788 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dyke, J.

This is an appeal from an order admitting a will to probate over the objection of contestants that the will had not been duly executed. The testator died in Reno, Nevada, being at the time a resident of the County of Amador, California. He was a patient in the Veterans’ Administration Hospital in Reno. The will was prepared by an attorney upon information given him by a sister of the testator. The proposed testament was typewritten by the attorney and then presented to the testator for approval and execution. The document as presented to the testator bore a typed signature line, above which was the word “his,” and below which was the typed name, “Harvey M. Gooch,” and below that the typed work “mark.” The attorney who had prepared the document had been informed that the proposed testator was unable to write because of his illness. The document having been explained and read to the testator, he then made his mark in the space prepared therefor and three persons present, including the attorney who had prepared the document, signed as witnesses to the mark. They also executed the attestation clause which was in the usual form. It is the contention of appellants on this appeal that *3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.