Drumm

People v. Drumm

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2937·211 Cal. App. 2d 499·27 Cal. Rptr. 255
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 1963Crim. No. 8134California2,879 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wood, J.

Defendant was accused, in two counts, of forgery. He admitted allegations of the information that he had been convicted four times on felony charges (larceny of auto, Missouri; assault with intent to commit robbery, Missouri; issuing check without sufficient funds, California; forgery, California). In a trial by jury he was convicted on both counts. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant contends that he was denied due process of law; and that the deputy district attorney was guilty of prejudicial misconduct.

Charles Barnett, the owner of a restaurant in Alhambra, testified: That he had known defendant about four months and had permitted him to “run up” a small bill at his restaurant. On May 31, 1961, defendant, accompanied by a woman and child, ate in his restaurant and offered a check in payment for that bill and also for the bill he owed previously, and asked for the difference in cash. This check, marked Exhibit 1, was for $31, drawn on the First Western Bank, payable to Harvey Drumm, and signed “Ella S. *501 Barnes.” He asked defendant whether the check was good, and told him he would rather wait until he could he paid in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.