Borden

Borden v. Piscovich

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2835·212 Cal. App. 2d 225·27 Cal. Rptr. 868
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1963Civ. No. 10460California1,074 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schottky, J.

Plaintiff Donald S. Borden, a licensed real estate broker, commenced an action to recover a $12,500 real estate sale commission claimed under a written selling authorization signed by defendant. Issue was joined and the case was tried by the court sitting without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, and plaintiff has appealed from said judgment.

The principal contention made by appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. Before discussing this contention, we shall give a brief summary of the evidence as shown by the record, bearing in mind the well-settled rule that evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent and that conflicts in the evidence must be disregarded.

On June 4, 1959, respondent entered into a written contract with appellant authorizing appellant to sell approximately 10 acres of respondent’s property located in Sacramento County for $125,000. It was agreed that the commission should be 10 per cent of the selling price.

*226 Mr. McClintock, representing a group of physicians, submitted an offer to buy this property on July 2, 1959, for the amount asked ($125,000), with a down payment of $48,000…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.