Burford

Burford v. Hartman

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2845·212 Cal. App. 2d 284·27 Cal. Rptr. 909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 1963Civ. No. 169California3,894 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conley, J.

This is an appeal from judgments approving the account of an executor, for preliminary distribution and related orders in a testate probate proceeding. The judgments appealed from, among other things, directed a preliminary distribution of equal one-third shares of specified property to each of two of decedent’s three daughters and denied distribution of the remaining one-third share to the trustee of a testamentary trust of which the third daughter, Miriam Miller Hartman, is life beneficiary. The principal question to be determined is whether it was reversible error for the trial court to deny preliminary distribution to the testamentary trustee at the same time that it ordered such distribution to the other major legatees named in decedent’s will.

*287 Katherine G. Miller died on November 29, 1960. Her will, dated November 14, 1958, and a codicil of March 1, 1959, were admitted to probate in the Superior Court of Tulare County on December 19, 1960. Pursuant to the provisions of the will, Burke E. Burford, an attorney at law and a member of the firm of Burford, Hubler & Burford, was appointed executor; he is also the trustee named in the will.

Mrs. Miller left one-third of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.