Cotton

Cotton v. Imperial Valley Union High School District

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2932·212 Cal. App. 2d 941·28 Cal. Rptr. 440
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1963Civ. No. 6905California304 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Monroe, J.

In this action the plaintiff and appellant sought recovery of a balance alleged to be due upon a construction contract. On May 26, 1959, the superior court made an order by which this action was consolidated with cause No. 6904 [ante, p. 879 ( 28 Cal.Rptr. 438 ) ] in this court and with two other actions likewise pending herein. This order provided for the appointment of a referee and further provided that each party advance one-half the costs and the amount so advanced should be recovered as costs by the prevailing party. In each of the four cases the appellant recovered a substantial amount. In this action the recovery was $2,550, with interest at the statutory rate from February 22, 1957. The original amount found due was the sum of $7,962.89, but this amount was reduced by reason of subsequent payments.

However, the court refused to award judgment for costs and *942 provided in the judgment that each person should pay his own costs of suit. By the provisions of section 1032, Code of Civil Procedure, plaintiff and appellant was entitled to costs as a matter of right. The facts and the law involved in the four cases are more fully set forth in the opinion in Cotton v. Imperial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.