Mihojevich

Mihojevich v. Harrod

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2614·214 Cal. App. 2d 360·29 Cal. Rptr. 440
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 1963Civ. No. 26383California1,692 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burke, J.

Plaintiff acquired a one-half interest in certain mining claims from defendants. Defendants transferred the remaining one-half interest to plaintiff as security for moneys advanced by plaintiff to defendants. Prior to these transfers to plaintiff the federal government filed two civil actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, one action to condemn the fee title to the property and the other to condemn a leasehold interest in the property. Defendants herein were likewise defendants in the condemnation actions although plaintiff was never served with process in those cases nor did he appear therein.

During the pendency of the condemnation suits, defendants and their attorney represented to plaintiff that if he would transfer the title to the mining claims back to defendants it would greatly expedite the settlement of the condemnation proceedings and enable both parties to secure compensation from the government for their property without delay. Defendants orally agreed that, in consideration of such re-transfer, an assignment to defendants of all rights to recover any prior rental value of the mining claims, and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.