Perkins

Perkins v. Dawson

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1704·222 Cal. App. 2d 610·35 Cal. Rptr. 276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1963Civ. No. 21044California1,923 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taylor, J.

Plaintiff, Louise M. Perkins, the assignee of a promissory note, appeals from a decree in equity setting aside a judgment by default against one of the comakers, respondent and cross-complainant, Olga Dawson. Cross-defendants, Jacquolyn Monson (the payee) and real party in interest, Everett Dawson (the other comaker) and John B. Swendsen, appeal from the decree and from an order denying their motion to strike and restore the default and judgment. The contentions on appeal are that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside the default 1 year, 5 months and 16 days after the entry of judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 473) and that the trial court erred in setting aside the default because the respondent had failed to prove that she was entitled to equitable relief.

On October 24, 1960, appellant Perkins, by her attorney, the appellant Swendsen, filed her complaint against appellant Everett Dawson and respondent Olga N. Dawson, alleging the assignment of a promissory note for $4,000, executed *612 on March 16, 1959, in favor of her assignor, appellant Mon-son. The complaint alleged that the note was unsecured, although the note, on its face, recited that it was secured by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.