Romano

People v. Romano

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1519·223 Cal. App. 2d 216·35 Cal. Rptr. 756
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 1963Crim. No. 4375California873 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Agee, J.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of section 288 of the Penal Code by his plea of guilty. His application for probation was denied and he was sentenced to state prison.

There was no motion for a new trial or appeal from the judgment of conviction. Up to and including pronouncement of sentence, defendant was represented by court-appointed counsel, Ben F. La Mar, Jr.

Seven months later, defendant mailed to the trial court a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. He sought to set aside his plea of guilty and the judgment based thereon.

The pertinent allegations in the petition are as follows: that fraud was practiced upon defendant in that the “members of the San Mateo Police Department, Deputy District Attorney Mr. Walter H. Harrington, Jr., and attorney Mr. Ben F. La Mar persuaded petitioner to plead guilty, as charged, with the firm promise that he would be granted probation”; that he believed that the promise would be honored and therefore he pled guilty. The petition infers that defendant claims that he is not guilty, although this is not expressly stated.

The allegations of the petition, if found to be true, might entitle defendant to the relief requested. (People…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.