Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 150 v. Superior Court

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100·228 Cal. App. 2d 452·39 Cal. Rptr. 590
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 14, 1964Civ. No. 10837California2,705 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schottky, J.

In this proceeding for a writ of prohibition we are concerned with the question whether, after the National Labor Relations Board has tentatively assumed jurisdiction over union organization efforts, a state court may enjoin a libel which is connected with a union’s attempt to organize a plant.

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local No. 150, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (the local) began a campaign to organize the employees of the real parties in interest, who may collectively be referred.to as “Coca Cola.”

In the Spring of 1963 the local filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board for the purpose of being certified as the collective bargaining representative of Coca Cola’s employees.

In June the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a complaint against Coca Cola in which it was charged that Coca Cola had committed unfair labor practices within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) The complaint alleged Coca Cola interfered with the exercise by the employees of their rights as guaranteed by section 7 of the act. ( 61 Stat. 140 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 .) This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.