Oxley

Oxley v. County of Orange

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1120·228 Cal. App. 2d 620·39 Cal. Rptr. 697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1964Civ. No. 7359California371 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Browngerald, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County denying a writ of mandate to compel the County of Orange to reinstate the petitioner, Esker Otto Oxley, to his former position, with back pay.

Oxley had been appointed Director of Finance by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange. On May 9, 1961, the board served notice on him that he was relieved of all duties and suspended without pay. At the same time an *621 acting director of finance was appointed. Later this appointment was made permanent.

Oxley’s formal demand for reinstatement, back wages, and fringe benefits was rejected. He then petitioned the Superior Court of Orange County for a writ of mandate. In denying the writ the court found that Oxley served at the pleasure of the board of supervisors and that he had been discharged.

The question raised on appeal is whether the board of supervisors had the power to discharge Oxley.

The hoard of supervisors has the power to regulate the terms of all deputies, assistants, and employees in the county (Cal. Const., art. XI, § 5). It may employ such persons as are necessary to assist it in the performance of its duties. (Gov. Code, § 25208.) In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.