Coke

People v. Coke

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 839·230 Cal. App. 2d 22·40 Cal. Rptr. 649
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1964Crim. No. 1924California2,952 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Griffin, J.

Defendant-appellant Constance Lee Coke was charged in an information with violations of Penal Code, sections 484-487 (grand theft), in that about March 15, 1962, she did feloniously take money in excess of $200 belonging to Harbour Realty Corporation and Walnut Partners. She entered a plea of not guilty after hearing on a motion to set aside the information under Penal Code, section 995. Defendant was found guilty as charged by a jury. A motion for new trial was denied and defendant was sentenced to state prison. Defendant, in propria persona, filed a notice of appeal.

Facts

Defendant applied for a position as PBX-receptionist at a multicorporate real estate development firm which had extensive subdivision operations, but being found to be better qualified as a bookkeeper she was employed in that capacity. As part of her duties, she received certain funds, including buyers’ deposits on home purchases and moneys paid by home buyers for optional extras to be installed in their homes. Upon defendant’s giving notice of her intention to quit, her employer sought an audit of the books. The audit revealed that funds in excess of $8,000 were missing from the buyers' extras account,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.