Quinones-Quintana

People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Quinones-Quintana

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1567·231 Cal. App. 2d 785·42 Cal. Rptr. 340
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1965Civ. No. 28292California856 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

This is an action in eminent domain.

After a jury trial, judgment was entered in September 1963 awarding defendants $160 for the property taken and $2,500 severance damages. The People moved for a new trial. On October 3, 1963, the court ruled on the motion by signing and filing the following order:

(Italics added.)

*787 Defendants received a copy of this order by mail from the clerk on October 4. On October 10 plaintiff mailed defendants a notice of the order of October 3, quoting it in full. On October 21 defendants filed their consent to a reduction of the severance damages to $1,500. Plaintiff filed a memorandum for setting and the case was set for trial in April 1964. Defendants, however, made a motion to prevent further trial of the action. Their motion was granted on December 13, 1963. It is from this order that plaintiff has appealed.

The question here presented is: Did the time to file a consent to a reduction of the judgment expire at the end of 10 days after the order of October 3 was signed and filed ! We are of the opinion this question must be answered in the affirmative.

First, we examine the language of the order. It is clear and specific. It states that “if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.