Larges

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Larges

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1509·232 Cal. App. 2d 631·43 Cal. Rptr. 44
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1965Civ. No. 28442California1,775 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lillie, J.

Hartford appeals from the adverse portions of a judgment in an action for declaratory relief. The insurer had sought a determination that it had no obligation to defend or indemnify, or thereafter pay any judgment rendered against Frank Lyons, doing business as The Lyon’s Den, under the *632 terms and conditions of a comprehensive, general automobile liability policy issued to Lyons, and James V. Larges, the named insured in a Hartford family automobile policy. The appeal relates solely to the conclusions reached as to the Larges policy.

The relevant facts are as follows: Lyons was in the catering business. On December 9, 1960, he was engaged to cater for a housing development in Santa Ana; to assist him Lyons hired defendant Larges, who was a bartender, and defendants Smith and Neely. The group was driven to Santa Ana by Lyons in a Ford Vanette owned by Lyons, the vehicle being a van type truck with six wheels (dual wheels on the rear). During the course of the evening Lyons went elsewhere, leaving the Vanette at the housing development. Later the same evening, presumably when the services of the three were no longer needed, on his own initiative Larges took the vehicle and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.