Hansen

Plaintiff has appealed from the whole of a judgment which granted her an interlocutory decree of divorce on the grounds of defendant’s extreme cruelty, provided for the custody and support of the minor daughter of the parties, declared certain items of property joint tenancy property, disposed specifically of certain insurance policies and other items of community property, awarded plaintiff a fixed sum payable in monthly installments as part of the distribution of community assets, denied her alimony, and granted her attorney’s fees. Her purported appeal from the denial of her motion for new trial must be dismissed as it is not an appeal-able order, although its propriety may be reviewed on the *579 appeal from the judgment. (People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Donovan (1962) 57 Cal.2d 346, 351 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 473 , 369 P.2d 1 ]; Neyens v. Sellnow (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 745, 746 [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 151 ]; Di Grandi v. Di Grandi (1951) 102 Cal.App.2d 442, 443 [ 227 P.2d 841 ]; Code Civ. Proc., § 963.)

Her attack on the judgment before this court, however, is limited to those portions thereof which denied her alimony and which declared that certain items of property were held by the…