Machel

People v. Machel

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 992·234 Cal. App. 2d 37·44 Cal. Rptr. 126
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1965Crim. No. 4539California6,079 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sullivan, J.

The court sitting without a jury found defendant guilty of possession of marijuana. (Health & Saf. *40 Code, § 11530.) 1 He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

On March 7, 1963, at about 8 :30 p.m., San Francisco Police Inspector Robert Martin, a member of the narcotics detail, accompanied by Inspector Lawler of that detail and Federal Agent Niblo went to apartment 101 at 1190 Pine Street, San Francisco, on a narcotics investigation. There Martin arrested Lewis Molin and Nadine Sweem, the occupants of the apartment, for possession of a marijuana cigarette. Nadine Sweem told Inspector Martin that they had obtained the cigarette from “a person by the name of Pete” who had left it there the night before. She said that Pete was expected to return that night at about 9 p.m. although she did not indicate the purpose of his visit.

After further discussing this person with Nadine Sweem, Martin reached the conclusion that he was defendant Peter Machel concerning whom he had certain information. Martin knew Machel to be an associate of a woman named Max Phelps whom Martin and Lawler had arrested for possession of marijuana in January 1963. On that occasion Martin with the permission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.